Called Ferdy Sambo's Order Only Destroying A Copy Of CCTV, Baiquni Wibowo's Attorney Asked For The Prosecutor's Indictment To Be Canceled

Session at South Jakarta District Court (Photo: DOK VOI)

JAKARTA - Baiquni Wibowo's attorney said that the indictment read by the Public Prosecutor (JPU) did not fully explain the facts. One of them is related to a copy of the CCTV footage. This was conveyed by the attorney at the exception trial or objection note which was held at the South Jakarta District Court, Wednesday, October 26. Baiquni Wibowo is a defendant in the obstruction of justice case or obstruction to the investigation into the murder case of Brigadier J. He previously served as PS Kasubbagriksa Bagga when Rowabprof of the Propam Police Division. "Regarding a copy of the CCTV footage located at the Complex Security Post The Duren Tiga RT05/RW01 Police Housing, Duren Tiga Village, Pancoran District, South Jakarta. Meanwhile, the original CCTV footage is DVR which has been submitted by the defendant Baiquni Wibowo to the South Jakarta Police Investigator as soon as the contents of the recording are copied or downloaded from DVR," explained the attorney, Wednesday, October 26. The order given by Ferdy Sambo was to delete or destroy a copy of the CCTV footage and did not elaborate on the compatibility between the CCTV footage and the original footage in the CCTV DVR. "So it turns out that the proof of the recording cannot be guaranteed the authenticity and integrity because it has never been matched with the original footage contained in the CCTV DVR," "That we as legal advisors firmly state that the indictment of the public prosecutor as above must be declared null and void because the public prosecutor is incomplete in outlining legal facts," said the attorney. The legal basis for the arguments submitted is Article 6 of the ITE Law which states as follows: “ In the event that there are other provisions other than those stipulated in Article 5 paragraph (4) which require that information must be written or genuine, Electronic Information and/or Electronic Documents are considered valid as long as the information contained in it can be accessed, displayed, guaranteed its integrity, and can be accounted for so as to explain a situation.”