Former Official Client Reported Jouska To Central Jakarta District Court, Requesting Compensation Of Rp.64.15 Billion

Founder and Chief Executive Office (CEO) of PT Jouska Finansial Indonesia, Aakar Abyasa Fidzuno. (Photo: Facebook Jouska Indonesia)

JAKARTA - The case of alleged misappropriation of client funds by PT Jouska Finansial Indonesia has entered a new phase. This time, the law office of Munde Herlambang & Partners representing 45 former Jouska customers has filed a lawsuit against the law through the Central Jakarta District Court on Wednesday, November 18.

The lawsuit has been accepted by case register No.676.Pdt.G / 2020 / PN.Jkt.Pst on 19 November 2020. This former customer sued the owner and President Director of PT Jouska Finansial Indonesia, Aakar Abyasa Fidzuno.

In addition, customers are also suing several securities companies. In the statement received by VOI, Thursday, November 19, it was stated that the plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against:

1. Aakar Abyasa Fidzuno as Defendant I

2. Caroline Himawati Hidajat, Defendant II

3. Josephine Handayani Hidajat, Defendant III

4. Chrisne Herawati, Defendant IV

5. PT Phillip Sekuritas Indonesia, Defendant V

6. PT Sentral Mitra Informatika Tbk, Defendant VI

7. PT Amarta Investa Indonesia, Defendant VII

8. PT Jouska Finansial Indonesia, Defendant VIII

9. PT Mahesa Strategis Indonesia, Defendant IX

10. PT MNC Sekuritas, Defendant X.

PT Jouska Finansial Indonesia (defendant VIII) through owner and chief executive Aakar Abyasa is suspected of directing the plaintiffs and even utilizing the accounts of the plaintiffs through defendants VII and / or IX who collaborated with defendants V and / or X to make a massive purchase of PT Sentra shares. Mitra Informatika Tbk (Defendant VI) with the ticker code LUCK.

"The massive purchase of shares resulted in a significant increase in the share price of PT Sentra Mitra Informatika Tbk (defendant VI) with the issuer code LUCK as a result of economic law that was deliberately created by Defendant I, where the large number of requests would certainly increase the selling price and not from valuation or valuation. the financial condition / assets / prospectus of Defendant VI's company itself, or in a more general term known in the public as the act of 'frying shares', "the statement said.

Then between Defendant I as shareholder and commissioner of PT Amarta Investa Indonesia (Defendant VII) and / or PT Mahesa Strategis Indonesia (Defendant IX) with Caroline (Defendant II), Josephine (Defendant III) and Christine (Defendant IV) as Shareholder of PT Sentra Mitra Informatika has signed an illegal agreement to cooperate in manipulating prices on the stock exchange and driving massive purchases through the use of unpublished information about the shares for the personal benefit of each party.

Meanwhile, the role of Defendant V and / or Defendant X as the securities company where the plaintiffs opened and kept funds in the form of an investor fund account (RDI) was suspected of providing access to or collaborating with PT Amarta Investa Indonesia (Defendant VII) and / or PT Mahesa Strategis Indinesia. (Defendant IX) who did not have a license as an investment manager, in order to carry out a sale and purchase transaction of LUCK shares without the consent and knowledge and confirmation of the plaintiff.

"The customers asked for material damages amounting to Rp41,648,727,743 and immaterial losses amounting to Rp22,500,000,000 and requested that the assets of the defendants be confiscated by the court," said the statement.