MEDAN - The Attorney General's Office summoned Jong Nam Liong's legal counsel. The summons was a follow-up to the report related to 2 prosecutors from the Medan Kejari in the case of alleged deed forgery with the defendant David Putra Negoro alias Liem Kwek Liong.
It is known that the defendant was charged with onslag by the prosecutor and acquitted by the Medan District Court Judge.
"I have come to fulfill a summons for questioning by Komjak RI regarding the reports of two prosecutors serving at the Medan Kejari," said Jong Nam Liong's lawyer, Longser Sihombing after being questioned at the AGO, Thursday, January 20.
Longser said that his party objected to the onslag charge against the accused for the alleged fraudulent deed David Putra Negoro alias Liem Kwek Liong.
"If the process is P-21, then it has fulfilled the criminal element. And during the second stage, it has also fulfilled the submission of evidence and suspects," he said.
On the indictment, he continued, Article 263, 266, 362, 372, 55, 56 of the Criminal Code were charged. However, the Public Prosecutor demanded onslag against the defendant.
Where in the article charged, there is not a single article that can be prosecuted onslag. It was a disappointment for Longser and his clients.
"The Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia is pleased to instruct the Head of the Medan District Attorney through the North Sumatran Attorney General to immediately register a cassation case against the acquittal (vrijspraak) of defendant David Putranegoro in Case Number: 2231/Pid.B/2021/PN.Mdn," said Longser.
In addition, his party also talked about the examination related to the prosecution's plan (rentut) by the prosecutor.
"The relationship between the examination and the implementation of the proposed lawsuit that was exposed on Monday, December 27, 2021 at the Pidum building of the Indonesian Attorney General's Office. What are the material for the exposure, the conclusions of the exposure and recommendations for the exposure of the proposed lawsuit. So the Kajari Medan through the Head of Pidum Riachard Sihombing and Candra Naibaho on Tuesday, December 28, 2021 In the afternoon, he read out the onslag demand order without reading the series of trial results which ignored or concealed the facts of the trial related to the mandate of the formulation of Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code concerning 5 (five) valid evidences, he explained.
"What is the relationship between these examinations, demands and demands with the trial on Tuesday, January 4, 2022. At the same time, only about an hour of reading the plea and the prosecutor's replik?," continued Longser.
Firmly, the lawyer also asked the Attorney General to remind his subordinates because they were deemed not to be in accordance with what was campaigned or conveyed.
"In fact, on several occasions, the Attorney General through the Jampidum reminded all staff to be careful and qualified in issuing products. Kajati and Kajari were also reminded that their staff should be given directions, instructions and guidance to prosecutors to seek the material truth of a case," said Longser.
The English, Chinese, Japanese, Arabic, and French versions are automatically generated by the AI. So there may still be inaccuracies in translating, please always see Indonesian as our main language. (system supported by DigitalSiber.id)
