JAKARTA - The new phase of the execution of the verdict in the CPNS fraud case involving Olivia Nathania is heating up.
Nia Daniaty's party, who was dragged as the executor, openly objected to the obligation to pay compensation of IDR 8.1 billion on a joint and several basis.
Nia Daniaty's lawyer, Nyoman Rae, criticized the court's decision to include his client's name in a civil payment obligation. In fact, according to him, Nia Daniaty has never been involved in a criminal legal process that ensnared his daughter, Olivia.
"This is what we question, the uniqueness in cases involving others does not fall within the criminal case. This is considered that it can be suspected that the trial is very misguided," said Nyoman Rae at the South Jakarta District Court.
Nyoman emphasized that his client did not know at all about the practice of recruiting fake CPNS by Olivia. He reasoned that the illegal activity was carried out in a location far from Nia Daniaty's reach.
"Based on the statement from my client, Mrs. Nia Daniaty, she doesn't know at all. Because the activity was held in a different office, which is far from Mrs. Nia Daniaty's residence. So I don't know at all. Who knows after there is a problem," Nyoman said.
On the other hand, the lawyer for the false CPNS victim, Odie Hudiyanto, still adheres to the contents of the judge's ruling. He assessed that Nia Daniaty's reason that he did not feel the need to pay because he was not imprisoned was a mistake in legal logic.
"I told them that it was different, sir. The criminal is the body that was put in the cage. If the agreement, return the money, it still has to be paid," said Odie Hudiyanto.
Odie added, in the summons hearing, Nia Daniaty's party had questioned why they had to bear the burden of payment even though they did not taste the cold of the prison cell like Olivia.
"His lawyer, Mrs. Nia, said, 'How do we have to pay for the rent? Because our client has nothing to do with this case. Because our client has never been imprisoned'. We said, yes, try to see what the verdict is," continued Odie.
Based on the civil judgment which has become legally binding, Nia Daniaty is said to have an obligation to return the money to the victims. If this obligation is not fulfilled, it is not impossible that his assets will be the target of execution.
"That Mrs. Nia will be responsible for confiscating or blocking her assets has to do with what her son, Olivia, did. So," concluded Odie.
The case, which started with the lure of civil servant positions, has caused hundreds of victims to suffer a total loss of Rp8.1 billion. Until now, the victims are still demanding a return of money that has not been realized concretely.
The English, Chinese, Japanese, Arabic, and French versions are automatically generated by the AI. So there may still be inaccuracies in translating, please always see Indonesian as our main language. (system supported by DigitalSiber.id)
