JAKARTA - The South Jakarta Religious Court officially granted Arya Saloka's divorce suit against Princess Anne through a verstek decision, after the respondent, Princess Anne, was not present twice even though she had been officially and officially summoned.
"Because this is the verstek, twice in a row the respondent (Putri Anne) was summoned but was not present. Even though he has been properly and officially summoned," said Suryana, Public Relations of the South Jakarta Religious Court, Wednesday, May 28.
In the divorce process, there were no other demands from Princess Anne's side, such as child support, idah and mutah income, or Gono-gini assets.
"(Children's livelihoods) are not there. Especially only divorce," said Suryana.
"(The demand for Gono's property) doesn't exist, it doesn't exist. It's just divorce," he continued.
"(Nafkah iddah and mutah) No. First he was because he was not present, then also was not stated in his application letter. Only divorce," he explained.
Meanwhile, on another occasion, Arya Saloka's attorney, Aflah Abdurrahim, explained that in the decision, child custody was given to Princess Anne based on legal considerations and facts revealed during the trial process.
SEE ALSO:
"For child custody, as stated in the statement of our foundering partner, Noverizky, and the results of the facts at the trial, child custody fell to Princess Anne," said Aflah.
This is in accordance with applicable legal provisions, where children who are still under the age of 12 are legally under the custody of their mother.
"By law is indeed under 12 years old, child custody falls to his mother," he concluded.
The English, Chinese, Japanese, Arabic, and French versions are automatically generated by the AI. So there may still be inaccuracies in translating, please always see Indonesian as our main language. (system supported by DigitalSiber.id)