JAKARTA - New developments have emerged in handling the case of alleged bribes and gratification of imports related to Blue Ray Cargo and a number of officials of the Directorate General of Customs and Excise (DJBC). The emergence of information regarding administrative adjustments to one container at Tanjung Emas Port, Semarang, has prompted an official explanation to be immediately presented to the public.
The container had previously attracted attention after being searched and linked to the Blue Ray Cargo operational network.
In a number of early reports, the container was also said to have links to suspected prohibited goods and/or import restrictions (lartas).
However, based on the information that has developed, it is said that there is an administrative adjustment or correction in the minutes related to the identification of the container's relationship with the main case being processed by the KPK.
Until now, there has been no official explanation regarding the substance of the administrative changes. Therefore, it is not yet certain whether the adjustment has an impact on the construction of the investigation, the connection between the containers with the main case, or only a technical administrative aspect.
Customs counterintelligence and legal analyst, R. Gautama Wiranegara, assessed that administrative changes in the investigation process were not something that was contrary to criminal procedure law.
According to him, adjustments can occur if investigators find new facts, initial identification errors, or the need to synchronize documents during the process.
"In the practice of investigation, administrative adjustments can occur if new facts, identification errors, or the need for document synchronization are found. That is not something abnormal," said Gautama, Saturday, May 23.
However, he assessed that the problem arose when the initial information first formed public perceptions, while the subsequent developments did not receive an equal explanation.
"In the public space, the most remembered is usually the first headline. When there is a correction, revision, or administrative adjustment, it often does not get the same attention," he said.
Gautama called this condition a phenomenon of narrative contamination, which is a situation when public opinion has been formed based on an initial construction that is not necessarily the same as the final proof.
According to him, official clarification is important so that there is no misleading perception of parties who have not been legally proven to have committed a crime.
Status of Imported Goods Must Be Proven Technically and Administratively
The container in question was said to contain items suspected of being related to the lartas category. However, from the packing list documents that had been circulating, the cargo was said to be dominated by motor vehicle components such as rear shock absorbers, disc brakes, brake pump repair kits, exhaust pipes, sprocket sets, and handle grips.
In general, these items fall into the group of spare parts for two-wheeled vehicles using the international trade classification HS Code 8714.
According to Gautama, the determination of the status of lartas is not automatically based on the name of the goods alone.
"What determines is not just the name of the goods, but the technical regulations. Whether it is a used item, it must be SNI, require certain import approvals, or have other administrative requirements. All of this must be proven technically and administratively," he explained.
He added that the use of terms such as cargo lartas, affiliated, and illegal import networks needs to be done carefully so as not to form a stigma against parties whose legal status has not been determined.
Transparency is Considered Important to Maintain the Credibility of the Investigation
Gautama assessed that the Blue Ray Cargo case had developed into a major case because it not only touched on the aspect of importing goods, but also the alleged conditioning of inspection lanes, rule set targeting, and the potential for leakage of the import supervision system. According to him, public communication discipline is an important part of the law enforcement process.
"Professional law enforcement is not only brave enough to announce seizures or searches. But also dare to explain when there are developments, corrections, or changes in administrative construction," he said.
He emphasized that openness of information can actually strengthen the legitimacy of the legal process.
"In big cases, the most dangerous mistake is not just arresting the wrong person. But letting the public believe in a construction that turns out to have changed or has not been fully proven," said Gautama.
This push for transparency is considered important so that the public can obtain a complete picture of the development of the case and not form a wrong perception before the entire process of proof is complete.
The English, Chinese, Japanese, Arabic, and French versions are automatically generated by the AI. So there may still be inaccuracies in translating, please always see Indonesian as our main language. (system supported by DigitalSiber.id)
