JAKARTA - Chairman of the Prosecutor's Commission (Komjak) Pujiyono Suwadi assessed that the revision of the Criminal Procedure Code (RKUHAP) needs to be done. One of the reasons is because the Criminal Procedure Code currently does not have a good system and only answers problems in the field.
"I convey that our Criminal Procedure Code has just answered field issues, it does not guarantee a fundamentally change in the system," said Pujiyono in a discussion entitled 'Revision of the Criminal Procedure Code and Threats: New Abuse of Power Room?' held by Iwakum in Jakarta, Friday, May 2.
Pujiyono said that one of the system problems that occurred was the relationship between the investigator and the public prosecutor regarding the process of compiling case files. Often, the research prosecutor returned the case file to the investigator because it was considered incomplete.
In this case, it is like the process of handling the case of the village head (Kades) of Kohod. Where, investigators from the Directorate of General Crimes at Bareskrim Polri are only investigating allegations of falsification of land certificates related to the Tangerang sea fence.
Meanwhile, the Attorney General's Office (AGO) believes that there is an element of corruption. Thus, asking the police to immediately investigate it.
"We are talking about relations and public prosecutors. The relationship is based on the back and forth of P-19 cases from investigators to public prosecutors," he said.
With the revision of the Criminal Procedure Code, it is hoped that there will be a change in the system. So, all problems that occur can be resolved.
However, said Pujiyono, based on the Problem Inventory List (DIM) from the DPR and the government, no ideas have emerged regarding changing the system.
"I read, please allow me to read both DIM from the DPR and DIM from the government, what I have read, I have not seen any correct idea 100 percent of the new Criminal Procedure Code is to lead to a system change," he said.
In addition, the Criminal Procedure Code is also said to be very important because it is a spirit for the Criminal Code and other laws. Thus, the revision process is very good because the current Criminal Procedure Code system is not in line with the Criminal Code
"This means that the importance of this Criminal Procedure Code is very, very important, so why was it replaced, the question was changed. It was replaced because the system system in the Criminal Procedure Code was no longer affordable with our new Criminal Code in 2023, right, we already have the Criminal Code No. 1 of 2023. It's no longer the same anymore, it's not in line," said Pujiyono.
The English, Chinese, Japanese, Arabic, and French versions are automatically generated by the AI. So there may still be inaccuracies in translating, please always see Indonesian as our main language. (system supported by DigitalSiber.id)
