KPK Cecar Istri H. M Kunang Soal Pertemuan dengan Sarjan yang Berujung Pemberian Uang

JAKARTA - The Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) has completed questioning a housewife named Kartika Sari in the case of alleged bribery of the ijon project that ensnared the non-active Regent of West Bekasi Ade Kuswara today.

He was questioned about a meeting held by Ade Kuswara's father, H. M. Kunang, with an entrepreneur named Sarjan.

From the information collected, Kartika is the wife of H. M. Kunang. As for Ade Kuswara's father, he has been named a suspect along with Sarjan after being caught in a hand-in-hand operation (OTT) some time ago.

"Investigators are investigating the knowledge of witnesses regarding meetings held by HMK with SRJ," said KPK spokesman Budi Prasetyo to reporters through his written statement, Wednesday, February 11.

Budi said the examination of Kartika was carried out at the KPK's Merah Putih building, Kuningan Persada, South Jakarta. "(Asked for information as, ed) a witness to the alleged corruption crime related to the ijon project bribe in the Bekasi Regency Government environment," he said.

As previously reported, the KPK named Bekasi Regent Ade Kuswara together with his father, H. M Kumang who also served as the Head of Sukadami Village, South Cikarang District; and a private named Sarjan as suspects in the alleged bribery case for the ijon project. They were detained at the KPK State Detention House (Rutan) for the first 20 days until January 8, 2026.

The three became suspects after being caught in a hand-in-hand operation (OTT) on Thursday, December 18.

Ade Kuswara and H.M Kunang as the recipients of bribes are suspected of violating Article 12 a or Article 11 and Article 12B of the Corruption Eradication Law (UU Tipikor) in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph 1-1 of the Criminal Code and Article 5 paragraph (1) letter a or b or Article 13 of the Tipikor Law in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph (1) -1 of the Criminal Code.

Meanwhile, Sarjan as the party who gave the bribe was suspected of violating Article 5 paragraph (1) letter a or b or Article 13 of the Corruption Law.