Vadel Badjideh Sentenced To 9 Years In Prison, Nikita Mirzani: Not Satisfied!

JAKARTA - Nikita Mirzani responded to the 9-year sentence handed down to content creator Vadel Badjideh for the alleged immoral act and abortion of his daughter, LM.

Nikita said that no matter how long the sentence given by the panel of judges against Vadel would not be able to restore the future of his eldest daughter.

"9 years, want 9 years, 12 years, 20 years old can no longer restore the future of my only child, Laura Meizani," said Nikita Mirzani at the South Jakarta District Court, Thursday, October 2.

It is undeniable that Nikita Mirzani as a mother admitted that she was hurt by Vadel's actions against her daughter.

"(As a mother) it really hurts!" said Nikita Mirzani.

"He doesn't know what it's like when a girl is taken care of alone, gives birth, takes care of herself, and raises herself, he doesn't understand," said Nikita Mirzani.

Even the mother of three children admitted that she was not satisfied with the fines and also the prison sentence given to Vadel Badjideh.

"Not satisfied (9 years old sentence). (In prison) forever," he concluded.

Previously, Vadel was sentenced to 9 years in prison and a fine of Rp. 1 billion.

"Therefore, the defendant is sentenced to 9 years in prison and a fine of 1 billion rupiah, if the defendant is unable to pay it, he will be replaced with imprisonment for 3 months. Establishing a period of detention and detention that has been carried out by the defendant is deducted from the sentence imposed. Keep the defendant in custody," continued the judge.

The panel of judges also explained a number of things that were considered in imposing sentences.

"Considering that before the panel of judges imposes a crime, it is necessary to consider the aggravating things that exist within the defendant. The aggravating thing: the defendant's actions are contrary to the norms of religion and propriety that live and grow in society. The mistakes made by the defendant are not covered by the defendant, but covered with other mistakes. That is, one act is covered with a second act, abortion, that means yes," explained the panel of judges.

In addition, Vadel is considered to have taken advantage of the condition of the victim's family which is not harmonious.

"The defendant took advantage of the unharmonic relationship between the victim's child and the witness mother of the victim's child. There was no peace between the defendant and the victim's child," he continued.

However, the panel of judges also considered the situation that eased the defendant.