Case Of Forgery Of Pagar Laut Deeds, Bareskrim Examines 44 Witnesses

The case of alleged deed forgery related to the sea fence in Tangerang waters continues to be investigated. The latest development, Bareskrim Polri has examined 44 witnesses.

"Until now, we have carried out examinations of 44 witnesses," said Director of General Crimes at Bareskrim Polri Brigadier General Djuhandani Rahardjo Puro to reporters, Monday, February 10.

Of the dozens of witnesses examined, some of them were residents of Kohod Village. Then there are also ranks of relevant ministries and agencies.

It is also believed that the number of witnesses will continue to grow. This is because the investigation process continues to this day.

"Of the 44 witnesses beside the villagers, we also summoned from the relevant ministries or agencies, including our experts, we have examined them," he said.

From the testimony of the witness, there is the name Arsin who is known to be the village head (Kades) of Kohod. From the examination, it was said that investigators found a mode used in the deed forgery action.

The reported party or the Head of Kohor Village collaborated with several other parties to make a fake deed to and use it as data on requests for recognition of rights

"Investigators also got a modus operandi where the reported party and friends made use of fake letters to apply for measurement and application for recognition of rights to the Tangerang Regency land office," said Djuhandani.

The case of alleged forgery of letters or authentic deeds related to the sea fence in Tangerang waters is known to have been upgraded to the investigation stage. Because, from the results of the case title, elements of criminal violation were found.

Adapun, penyelidikan kasus pagar laut sejak 10 Januari 2025. Dugaannya pengajuan sertifikat hak guna bangunan (SHGB) dan sertifikat hak milik (SHM) pada area pagar laut di Tangerang, Banten, menggunakan girik palsu.

From the deepening, information was obtained that the sea fence area in Tangerang already has SHGB and SHM with details of 234 SHGB fields in the name of PT Intan Agung Makmur, 20 SHGB fields in the name of PT Cahaya Inti Sentosa, 9 fields in the name of individuals and 17 SHM fields from the girik.

It is suspected that the SHGB and SHM submissions used girik-girik and other ownership evidence documents that were allegedly fake.