Peradi Surabaya Files "Amicus Curiae" To The Supreme Court Regarding Ronald Tannur's Free Verdict

SURABAYA - DPC Indonesian Advocates Association (Peradi) Surabaya, East Java submitted Amicus Curiae (Kahabat Pengadilan) to the Supreme Court (MA) following the acquittal knocked by the Chief Justice of the Surabaya District Court, Erintuah Damanik, against the defendant Ronald Tannur in the murder case of Dini Sera Afrianti.

The chairman of the Surabaya PERADI DPC, Hariyanto, said that AMIcus Curiaeini's submission was a form of concern for the victim of Dini Sera Afrianti because the decision taken by the judge hurt the sense of justice and law in Indonesia.

"Because there is a sense of justice that is injured, we put it in the form of Amicus Curiaelective into a unit which was signed by at least 30 advocates," he said as quoted by ANTARA, Monday, August 12.

He said, there are eight main points of view from the perspective of the Peradi Surabaya DPC which can be used as consideration for Supreme Court judges in an effort to seek justice for Dini Sera Afrianti.

"One of them is the judge's decision which states that the victim died from a alcoholic drink. Even though the post-mortem clearly shows that the victim died from lacerations to the victim's internal organs caused by blunt objects," he said.

- https://voi.id/berita/407168/turki-tawarkan-bantuan-padamkan-kebakaran-hebat-di-hutan-yunani

- https://voi.id/berita/407155/penusukan-bocah-11-tahun-di-leicester-square-london-tak-terkait-teror-pasca-rusuh-antimuslim-di-inggris

- https://voi.id/berita/407149/pakistan-tangkap-mantan-bos-intelijen-jenderal-faiz-hammed

- https://voi.id/berita/407143/serangan-ukraina-bikin-kewalahan-putin-rusia-akan-pukul-mundur-pasukan-musuh-di-perbatasan-kursk

- https://voi.id/berita/407116/wanita-dan-bocah-11-tahun-ditikam-di-leicester-square-london

In taking this step, the Surabaya Peradi DPC cannot be arbitrary, his party must first wait for a copy of the official decision issued by the Surabaya District Court. This step was only taken after considering all the available facts.

"We have to wait for an official decision, without it we don't just talk. After getting a copy of the official verdict that was exposed, then we can talk based on the law we know," he said.