Covering Up The Murder Of A Man Wrapped In A Sarong, The Suspect Creates A Scenario To Collect Debt To Bali

The FA suspect, the perpetrator of the murder of AH (31), a man whose body was found wrapped in a sarong in the Pamulang area, South Tangerang, is said to have prepared a scenario to cover up his actions.

Based on the results of the examination, the suspect FA designed the story when the victim who is also his uncle went to Bali.

"FA conveyed to make a scenario with another story that on Friday, May 10, at 15.00 WIB, the victim went to Bali," said Head of Sub-Directorate for Resmob of the General Criminal Investigation Directorate of the Polda Metro Jaya AKBPKalau Yudho Ully to reporters, Tuesday, May 14.

In the scenario made by the suspect, the victim is said to be meeting his former employee named Saiful by car. The goal is to collect debts.

In addition, the victim also forbade the suspect FA to tell his family.

The scenario was created so that local residents and the families of the victims were not suspicious of the disappearance of AH.

"For this matter (the victim went to Bali) don't tell the people of my house," saidten.

The scenario made by the FA was also conveyed to NA, who is also a suspect in this case. He agreed to the story and thought the scenario was the most appropriate.

"The scenario (victim went to Bali) was approved by N," saidten.

AH is a grocery trader who was killed at his shop in Dukuh Village, Ciputat, Friday, May 10.

After being killed, the victim's body was wrapped in a sarong and then dumped on an empty residential area in the South Tangerang area. The bodies of the victims were only found by local residents on May 11.

From the results of the investigation and investigation, the police named the FA as a suspect. He is the victim's nephew. The motive for the murder was because he was often treated harshly.

Not only that, the police also named NA as the second suspect. He is an employee selling soto who played a role in helping FA dispose of the victim's body.

In this case, both were charged with Article 340 of the Criminal Code, subsidiary to Article 338 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 55 and or Article 56 of the Criminal Code and Article 181 of the Criminal Code and or Article 221 of the Criminal Code.