Judge Prosperous Bripka RR Is Not Suspicious See Strong Ma'ruf Bring Pisau: Is It Planned In Magelang?

JAKARTA - The panel of judges at the South Jakarta District Court was confused by the attitude of Bripka Ricky Rizal who was indifferent when he saw Ma'ruf carrying a knife while chasing Nopriansyah Yosua Hutabarat alias Brigadier J.

Strong Ma'ruf did carry a knife while chasing Brigadier J at Ferdy Sambo's house in Magelang, Central Java. The judge's sense of surprise began when he questioned the experience of Bripka RR while he was a police officer.

"Are you just on duty in the Traffic?" asked the judge during a trial at the South Jakarta District Court, Monday, December 5.

"So far, just in Traffic (traffic)," answered Ricky.

Bripka RR before becoming an aide for several years when Ferdy Sambo served as the Brebes Police Chief in 2013. Then, he occupied the Brebes Police Traffic Unit.

"Never at the Criminal Investigation Unit?" asked the judge again.

"No," replied Ricky.

Hearing this testimony, the judge was surprised about the absence of the instincts of a member when he saw someone carrying a knife while chasing someone else.

In fact, the judge assessed that an incident like that was definitely showing something the problem was happening.

"I'm confused whether it really has no instincts, right? People chasing with knives are not considered a problem," said the judge.

Until finally, the judge began to suspect that Bripka RR had indeed planned the murder of Brigadier J. In fact, since they were in Magelang.

"Has you actually planned this since Magelang?" asked the judge.

"Ready, nothing, because we don't know what really happened," said Bripka RR.

Bripka RR was presented as a witness for the defendants Strong Ma'ruf and Bharada E in the trial of the alleged murder case of Brigadier J.

For information, Bharada E, Bripka RR, and Strong Ma'ruf are defendants in the alleged murder case of Brigadier J. They were charged with helping and supporting Ferdy Sambo's plan.

Thus, they are strongly suspected of violating Article 340 of the Criminal Code, subsidiary to Article 338 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph 1 to (1) of the Criminal Code.