Statements Of 10 Witnesses Who Became The Basis For The Suspicion That Inspector General Ferdy Sambo Was Unprofessional To Investigate The Case Of Brigadier J's Murder

JAKARTA - Inspector General Ferdy Sambo is suspected of being unprofessional in handling the case of Brigadier J. The allegation is based on the statements of 10 witnesses.

"From the 10 witnesses and some evidence, Irsus determined that Inspector General Pol FS was suspected of committing violations related to the issue of unprofessionalism at the crime scene," said Head of the Public Relations Division of the National Police Inspector General Dedi Prasetyo at a press conference handling the case of Brigadier J's murder, Saturday, August 6 night.

However, it is not clearly explained the witnesses who have been examined. Including evidence that is said to have been bagged.

Only conveyed, the alleged unprofessional form of Inspector General Ferdy Sambo because he was indicated to be involved in the destruction or disappearance of the CCTV 'key witness'.

"I mentioned earlier, in the implementation of the TKP, as the head of the Indonesian National Police said that CCTV was taken and so on," said Dedi.

For this reason, Inspector General Ferdy Sambo has now been 'sent' to a special place located at the Mobile Brigade Headquarters, Kelapa Dua, Depok.

Meanwhile, Inspector General Ferdy Sambo has been questioned four times. The last one took place at the Criminal Investigation Unit of the National Police on Thursday, August 4. Meanwhile, the others will take place at Polda Metro Jaya and Polres Jakarta Selatan

In this case, National Police Chief General Listyo Sigit Prabowo has examined 25 members. Three of them were one-star generals.

In fact, out of the dozens of members, four were 'sent' to a special place. The reason behind it is because they are considered unprofessional in handling the case of Brigadier J.

In addition, Bareskrim also named Bharada E as a suspect in the murder of Brigadier Yosua Hutabarat alias Brigadier J.

Then, Bharada RE was charged with Article 338 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 55 and Article 56 of the Criminal Code.