The AGO's Reason For Implementing Andi Irfan Jaya's Bribes Of Judges

JAKARTA - The Attorney General's Office (AGO) has mentioned the reasons behind the alleged bribery of the judge against the suspect Andi Irfan Jaya. Andi Irfan became a suspect in a criminal consensus in the processing of a fatwa at the Supreme Court (MA) so that Djoko Tjandra would not be executed in the Bank Bali case.

Attorney General's Director of Investigation for Special Crimes (Jampidsus), Febrie Ardiansyah, said that the suspicion of bribery against you occurred when Andi Irfan Jaya planned to process the fatwa of MA Djoko Tjandra.

"During the consensus," Febrie told reporters, Thursday, September 3.

However, Febrie did not explain the consensus in detail. He said that the matter of handling the fatwa at the Supreme Court was only the mode of prosecutor Pinangki Sirna Malasari.

"How could you just Pinangki," he said.

Previously, the Attorney General's Office charged Andi Irfan with the original Article 5 paragraph (2) jo paragraph (1) letter b or Article 6 paragraph (1) letter a jo. Article 15 of Law No.31 of 1999 as amended and supplemented by Law No. 20 of 2001 concerning Eradication of Corruption in conjunction with. Article 55 paragraph (1) 1 of the Criminal Code.

Article 5 deals with paying bribes. Meanwhile, Article 6 paragraph (1) letter a is giving or promising something to the judge with the intention of influencing the verdict of a case submitted to him for trial.

Regarding the alleged bribery to the judge, Hari Setiyono, Head of the General Prosecutor's Office, also did not want to disclose.

"It's still a conjecture, not necessarily true," said Hari separately.