KPK Receives Complaints Regarding Burglary At Bank DKI Up To Rp50 Billion

JAKARTA - The Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) said it had received public complaints regarding PT Bank DKI's information system and technology which was suspected of having an anomaly.

"It is true that the KPK has received various complaints of alleged corruption crimes from the public, one of which has been received by the Correspondence Section of the KPK," Acting KPK Spokesperson for Enforcement Affairs Ali Fikri told reporters, Friday, December 17.

Furthermore, this complaint will be verified and reviewed first. This step, said Ali, is important to find out whether the complaint is in accordance with the anti-corruption authority and is included in the realm of corruption.

"But until now, the KPK has not been able to convey what and how the substance of the complaint," he said.

If these elements are met and the Corruption Eradication Commission has the right to follow up, Ali said his party will convey it to the public. This submission is important as a form of transparency.

"KPK is well aware that the participation of the community in efforts to eradicate corruption is very important and needed. Moreover, most of the cases handled by the KPK stem from public reports," said Ali.

For information, this report is the aftermath of the PT Bank DKI ATM burglary in November 2019 which resulted in a loss of IDR 50 billion.

This report was made by the attorney for former Satpol PP employee Insan Oenyoen, Bahrain. In his written statement, the reporter requested that the KPK investigate anomalies that occurred on the part of PT Bank DKI and/or Bank DKI IT System and/or Bank DKI IT Vendor System.

This request was submitted to the KPK because until now other law enforcers have not carried out digital forensic audits. Not only that, they also did not present any interested parties, thus making Oenyoen disadvantaged.

"That due to the absence of serious instructions by law enforcers to conduct digital forensic audits and or to present interested parties who are responsible for the occurrence of the system error, it is reasonable to suspect that an error has occurred in the application of the law which has resulted in our client being greatly harmed. for being used as a scapegoat for this incident," Bahrain said in a written statement.