Supreme Court Decision Wins Gianyar Regency Government Over Ubud Market Dispute

Gianyar Regent I Made Mahayastra (white traditional clothes) is reviewing the construction of the Ubud tourism thematic market. BETWEEN/HO-Humas Gianyar Regency Government

GIANYAR - The Supreme Court issued a decision that upheld the decision of the Denpasar State Administrative Court (PTUN) which won the Gianyar Regency Government, Bali, over the dispute against PT Citraprassasi Konsorindo (PT CK) related to the Ubud Market development dispute.

Head of the Gianyar District Attorney's Office, Agus Wirawan Eko Saputro, emphasized that from the start his party ordered the State Attorney's Team to optimally oversee from a normative juridical perspective the construction of the Ubud Tourism Thematic Market revitalization construction.

This, he said, is in the form of legal assistance as well as legal assistance for litigation as a tangible manifestation of support for national priority programs, namely strengthening infrastructure to support economic development.

This landslide victory in the Administrative Court case, he continued, increased the number of achievements and contributions of the Gianyar State Attorney's Team in overseeing a productivity increase program for inclusive economic transformation through accelerating the provision of basic service infrastructure and economic infrastructure to support sectors that are driving for recovery and economic growth in this area.

The case with the number: 146 K/TUN/2023 was finally won by the State Attorney for the Gianyar District Attorney as the recipient of the power of the respondent to the cassation of the Head of the Department of Industry and Trade of the Gianyar Regency.Access from the official website of the Supreme Court's Decision, in a meeting of the panel of judges' deliberation at the cassation level at the Supreme Court on May 16, 2023, rejected the appeal request from PTCitraprassisti Konsorindo (PT CK) and sentenced the applicant (PT CK) to pay court fees.

In brief, in its consideration, the panel of judges argued that there was no mistake or mistake in the decision of the Surabaya State Administrative High Court in this case. Second, the dispute between the plaintiff / applicant of cassation and the defendant / defendant of cassation related to the issuance of the object of dispute, namely the termination of the agreement (contract) caused by a default which refers to the contents of the agreement / contract letter which is the domain of civility under the authority of the district court.

Therefore, the object of the dispute is proven to be included in the exception of the state administration decision as referred to in the provisions. With the cassation decision, the letter from the Head of the Gianyar Industry and Trade Office which terminated the Ubud Market development contract, then disputed by PT CK in the Administrative Court and the Supreme Court, was declared valid and valid.

The Gianyar Trade and Industry Office issued a policy of terminating the agreement letter (contract) to PT Citra Prasasti Konsorindo as the provider of Ubud Tourism Thematic Market revitalization construction for defaulting. In August 2022, PT Citra Prasasti Konsorindo filed a lawsuit against the Denpasar Administrative Court. PTUN rejected PT CK's lawsuit, then appealed an appeal to the Supreme Court, and issued a final decision that upheld Denpasar PTUN's decision.