JAKARTA - The defendant in a case of alleged gratification in the processing of a fatwa from the Supreme Court (MA), prosecutor Pinangki Sirna Malasari, cried when he responded to Anita Kolopaking's testimony.
Pinangki's cry began when he mentioned that Anita Kolopaking's testimony was wrong. Although overall, Anita Kolopaking's statement called Pinangki is in accordance with the facts.
"In principle, the witness' testimony is correct. There are several excluded responses," said Pinangki at the trial at the Corruption Court, Central Jakarta, Wednesday, November 25.
Pinangki also mentioned his meeting with Anita at the trial. At that time, Pinangki shed tears. His voice began to change, like holding back tears.
"Previously, I only met (with Anita) after March. Sorry Ma'am if something goes wrong. We are friends, we met her here," said Pinangki, crying.
Until finally, the panel of judges ended Pinangki's response by changing the topic of conversation. Pinangki was asked to stay focused on responding to Anita's testimony.
Attorney Pinangki in the hearing said that one of the statements he considered was wrong about the US $ 50,000 bill. According to Pinangki, the money was related to buying and selling diamond rings.
Meanwhile, Anita said the money was a legal fee payment from Joko Tjandra which was entrusted to Andi Irfan Jaya.
The English, Chinese, Japanese, Arabic, and French versions are automatically generated by the AI. So there may still be inaccuracies in translating, please always see Indonesian as our main language. (system supported by DigitalSiber.id)